

cheers josh
well the good news is you can help make this site a better place and that would be to start using a spell checker (Firefox) and writing in full words, please.josh strong wrote:wen u think about it it sounds the same i guess lol because it can still only try and come out the 1 way so there for its gotta b the same thing lol ? i think this is 1 off the best car sites everthanks to the people who started it
cheers josh
don't be sorry dude. if you aren't all that great at spelling then so what. just ignore the nasty comments and keep asking the questions you need answered. this is after all a car forum and not a spelling contest!josh strong wrote:sorry was out at the time so had no spell check or anythingand i cant spell for shit
so sorry
Id do that over the microleb hands down on the previso that it is set up with the biggest vane afm it will handle!josh strong wrote:i was think.
ing a nistune ?
that should explain\Damo wrote:Not the shaft bearings, but definitly the thrust.Kimmo wrote:You mean excessive backpressure (like the standard dump would cause) is harder on the bearing than off-boost compressor surge?Damo wrote:Whilst backing off, surge is not as bad as having a restrictive exhaust (back pressure at the turbine exducer).
Compressor surge is an ugly thing; if what you say is true, I'm surprised the standard dump is so bad.
That should have read "Whilst 'Backing off surge' blah blah blah.
But yes, any backpressure is a bad thing for turbo. Exhaust pressure (post turbo) pushes the shaft onto its thrust bearing, and loads up the oil control seals with exhaust gases trying to force their way to freedom anyway they can.
Post turbo backpressure basicly reduces the efficiency of the turbine as a whole, as it needs more pressure across it to generate enough force to drive the compressor to a certain psi level. Which also introduces more twisting force on the shaft (which isn't a problem with anything but a ceramic turbine wheel realy).
Post turbo pressure also forces up back pressure in the exhaust manifold increasing pumping losses through the engine, which requires the turbo to work even harder to generate a given boost pressure.
I would go as far to say that a T2 running 20psi on a E15 with minimal total exhaust back pressure would last longer than the same T2 running 12psi on a completely stock exhausted E15 engine.
The factory don't bother about it because at stock boost levels it isn't a biggy.
Which leads to the BOV argument. IMHO, factory BOV are for NVH 95% turbo longevity 5%.
Damo
You just need more training grasshopper.Damo wrote:Id do that over the microleb hands down on the previso that it is set up with the biggest vane afm it will handle!josh strong wrote:i was think.
ing a nistune ?
The more time I spend looking at glen's mtech, the more I have an appreciation for a factory or top shelf ecu.
Damo
Forcd4 wrote:Oh fuk no dude it's you a again, the oracle.
The thing WILL make bulk power old fruit, there is no doubt about it, but the resolution down low is just appalling.tassuperkart wrote:You just need more training grasshopper.Damo wrote:Id do that over the microleb hands down on the previso that it is set up with the biggest vane afm it will handle!josh strong wrote:i was think.
ing a nistune ?
The more time I spend looking at glen's mtech, the more I have an appreciation for a factory or top shelf ecu.
Damo
Ill give Glens engine a tune when Im up there in April baaahahahahah
Even tho the basic architecture of the Microtec appears pretty lame, they can be made to perform remarkably well and easily.
L8r
E