N12Turbo.com lanyards are now available! Click here to visit the shop

were to put AFM

General chat related to anything N12.
josh strong
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:35 pm
Location: HOBART tasmania

were to put AFM

Post by josh strong »

hey people ...were would b a better spot for afm in front of turbo or in the cooler piping i want some flutter but if it no good in the cooler piping i will have to put it in front of turbo ?


cheers for any advice
User avatar
etking
Posts: 1214
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:42 pm
Location: Hobart, Tas

Post by etking »

if not in the bin then in front of turbo mate
Members Ride: http://forum.n12turbo.com/viewtopic.php?t=6786
85 ET, M/tech LT10X, T28, FMIC 2.5" Stainless Piping, 3" Intake, Dump n Zorst, JDM Inlet, CA18DET Injectors, Bosch 040, Bodykit, 17s
User avatar
baz
Posts: 1298
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Hobart / Tasmania

Post by baz »

In the cooler piping for flutter, Up close near the TB is best, I can show you a picture of my setup I had on the exa, It fluttered crazy, Infront of the turbo you will get less flutter, With it in the piping you can then fiddle with a "dose pipe" :\
My old exa I created from granny spec to a neat little BRIGHT car: http://forum.n12turbo.com/viewtopic.php?t=3903

Current Car: 2004 Vz SS Ute
User avatar
Kimmo
Posts: 2287
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:40 am
Location: Footscray

Post by Kimmo »

Put your hand up if you know flutter is the sound of your turbo having its arse flogged out.

It's a bad sound... might as well say you like the chain on your bike to squeak.
User avatar
Damo
Posts: 1482
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Canberra

Post by Damo »

Kimmo wrote:Put your hand up if you know flutter is the sound of your turbo having its arse flogged out.

It's a bad sound... might as well say you like the chain on your bike to squeak.
Whilst boosting, "surge is bad, mkay!'

Whilst backing off, surge is not as bad as having a restrictive exhaust (back pressure at the turbine exducer).



Damo
Do humanity a favor, use your brain and fight the forces of WOO WOO!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1mrbxhWU5Y
User avatar
Kimmo
Posts: 2287
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:40 am
Location: Footscray

Post by Kimmo »

Damo wrote:Whilst backing off, surge is not as bad as having a restrictive exhaust (back pressure at the turbine exducer).
You mean excessive backpressure (like the standard dump would cause) is harder on the bearing than off-boost compressor surge?

Compressor surge is an ugly thing; if what you say is true, I'm surprised the standard dump is so bad.
skez
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:18 pm

Post by skez »

who cares dosing sounds fucking awsome
User avatar
n12sumfin
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 6:29 pm
Location: NeWy

kk

Post by n12sumfin »

Kimmo wrote:
Damo wrote:Whilst backing off, surge is not as bad as having a restrictive exhaust (back pressure at the turbine exducer).
You mean excessive backpressure (like the standard dump would cause) is harder on the bearing than off-boost compressor surge?

Compressor surge is an ugly thing; if what you say is true, I'm surprised the standard dump is so bad.
and why would it be harder on the bearing?? i think you mean harder on the fins on the shaft, the bearings are located on the shaft and free spin, if you were to have surge it would only slow the speed at most.
User avatar
Damo
Posts: 1482
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Canberra

Post by Damo »

Kimmo wrote:
Damo wrote:Whilst backing off, surge is not as bad as having a restrictive exhaust (back pressure at the turbine exducer).
You mean excessive backpressure (like the standard dump would cause) is harder on the bearing than off-boost compressor surge?

Compressor surge is an ugly thing; if what you say is true, I'm surprised the standard dump is so bad.
Not the shaft bearings, but definitly the thrust.

That should have read "Whilst 'Backing off surge' blah blah blah.

But yes, any backpressure is a bad thing for turbo. Exhaust pressure (post turbo) pushes the shaft onto its thrust bearing, and loads up the oil control seals with exhaust gases trying to force their way to freedom anyway they can.

Post turbo backpressure basicly reduces the efficiency of the turbine as a whole, as it needs more pressure across it to generate enough force to drive the compressor to a certain psi level. Which also introduces more twisting force on the shaft (which isn't a problem with anything but a ceramic turbine wheel realy).

Post turbo pressure also forces up back pressure in the exhaust manifold increasing pumping losses through the engine, which requires the turbo to work even harder to generate a given boost pressure.

I would go as far to say that a T2 running 20psi on a E15 with minimal total exhaust back pressure would last longer than the same T2 running 12psi on a completely stock exhausted E15 engine.

The factory don't bother about it because at stock boost levels it isn't a biggy.
Which leads to the BOV argument. IMHO, factory BOV are for NVH 95% turbo longevity 5%.



Damo
Do humanity a favor, use your brain and fight the forces of WOO WOO!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1mrbxhWU5Y
User avatar
Kimmo
Posts: 2287
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:40 am
Location: Footscray

Post by Kimmo »

Thanks for the info, man : )
josh strong
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:35 pm
Location: HOBART tasmania

Post by josh strong »

thanks for all the info guys i have learnt a lot of this site thanks to all that give info its great
:D




cheers josh :D
User avatar
Kimmo
Posts: 2287
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:40 am
Location: Footscray

Re: kk

Post by Kimmo »

n12sumfin wrote:and why would it be harder on the bearing?? i think you mean harder on the fins on the shaft, the bearings are located on the shaft and free spin, if you were to have surge it would only slow the speed at most.
If you consider the bearing (which is a straight bushing with oil flowing through it), you can see that there's a built-in potential for radial backlash, simply because there has to be room for the oil.

And when you consider the compressor and turbine housings' inlets and outlets are tangentially oriented to the shaft (and act on it via the blades) at whatever angle you have your turbo rotated to, loads introduced to the turbine/compressor assembly will be passed on to the bearing, because the bearing is what allows the blades to translate flow to/from spin by preventing any other motion.

So if you have a chaotic situation like compressor surge happening, there are a whole bunch of forces making the shaft basically want to thrash around inside the bearing... and if this is happening when you're lifting off, presumably this nastiness will be accompanied by a corresponding drop in oil pressure.

I reckon I'd rather avoid it, and get a few hundred million more revs out of my turbo before it's junk.
User avatar
n12sumfin
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 6:29 pm
Location: NeWy

Re: kk

Post by n12sumfin »

Kimmo wrote:
n12sumfin wrote:and why would it be harder on the bearing?? i think you mean harder on the fins on the shaft, the bearings are located on the shaft and free spin, if you were to have surge it would only slow the speed at most.
If you consider the bearing (which is a straight bushing with oil flowing through it), you can see that there's a built-in potential for radial backlash, simply because there has to be room for the oil.

And when you consider the compressor and turbine housings' inlets and outlets are tangentially oriented to the shaft (and act on it via the blades) at whatever angle you have your turbo rotated to, loads introduced to the turbine/compressor assembly will be passed on to the bearing, because the bearing is what allows the blades to translate flow to/from spin by preventing any other motion.

So if you have a chaotic situation like compressor surge happening, there are a whole bunch of forces making the shaft basically want to thrash around inside the bearing... and if this is happening when you're lifting off, presumably this nastiness will be accompanied by a corresponding drop in oil pressure.

I reckon I'd rather avoid it, and get a few hundred million more revs out of my turbo before it's junk.
interesting way of looking at it.
josh strong
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:35 pm
Location: HOBART tasmania

Post by josh strong »

so i was told flutter and serge are complete different ? flutter is harmless as it is cutting through the air ?and surge is air pushing against the blades on the fan to try and stop it from spinning ? and u can hear the difference as 1 sounds nice and the other is ment to b a real horrible fluttery snezzie type noise dont no if this is true but it made sense to me so yea :D :?:






cheers Josh
User avatar
tassuperkart
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 5578
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 8:39 pm
Location: Southern Tasmania
Contact:

Post by tassuperkart »

Ahhhhhh nope!
Forcd4 wrote:Oh fuk no dude it's you a again, the oracle.
Post Reply